Login

I-140/I-485 - Employment Green Card Adjustment Of Status For Aliens Who Worked Illegally

A July 14, 2008 memorandum by the USCIS addresses adjustment of status applications for employment-based green card applicants who previously worked illegally. It instructs USCIS officers to permit adjustment of status to Legal Permanent Resident (LPR) under Section 245(k) for such aliens under certain circumstances. Qualifying aliens are those that filed employment-based I-140 green card petitions under one of the following employment preferences: EB-1, EB-2, EB-3 or EB-4. Such aliens are eligible for adjustment of status if they have not engaged in unauthorized employment since their last entry for an aggregate period of more than 180 days. The memorandum also clarifies that aliens’ unauthorized employment in previous entries into the U.S. do not count in calculating the 180-day unauthorized employment period.

This directive makes it easier for those employment green card applicants who may have violated the terms of their stay or worked illegally to remain in the U.S. while pursing their I-485 adjustment of status applications. Such aliens would ordinarily have been required to leave the U.S. in order to pursue consular green card processing as a result of their ineligibility for the adjustment of status process. [Click here to review the Employment-based Adjustment of Status Memorandum]

 

PERM ETA 9089 - Finance Manager Requires Recruitment for Professional Position

BALCA - This decision says that where an employer seeks a PERM Labor Certification for the position of finance manager, it is required to conduct the type of recruitment specified for professional positions. The employer in this case had followed the recruitment process for a non-professional positions instead of the one specified for professional positions. The DOL noted that professional position recruitment was required for the finance manager position, especially because the position is listed on the Appendix A to the Preamble of the final PERM regulations. [Read the PERM Professional Recruitment Decision]

PERM Labor Certification ETA 9089 - Employer And Alien Cannot Be One And The Same

In this BALCA decision, the employer submitted two separate ETA 9089 PERM Labor certification applications for two positions. The sponsoring employer’s petitions listed the employee for each of the position as himself. The employer essentially sought self-sponsorship for himself in two different positions.

The Department Of Labor noted that a bona fide job opportunity did not exist which was truly open to U.S. workers because of the relationship between the employer and the alien. [Read the PERM Self-sponsor Decision]

 

PERM Labor Certification - Alien Must Have Qualifications Before Hire By PERM Employer

In this BALCA decision, the employer submitted a labor certification (ETA 750A and 750B) application on behalf of the alien. On the application however, the petitioning employer was not able to show that the alien had the requisite experience before he was initially hired. Under Section 656.21(b)(5), an employer must demonstrate that the requirements it specifies for the job are its actual minimum requirements and that it has not hired the alien or other workers with less training or experience for jobs similar to the one offered. [PERM Labor Certification - Alien Must Have Qualifications Before Hire By PERM Employer

-->